Pacer's Fall

by:WindyCityStat1 linggo ang nakalipas
544
Pacer's Fall

Hindi Lang Kasiyahan ang Pagbagsak

Apat na taon akong gumagawa ng mga modelo para sa ESPN gamit ang Python at machine learning. Kaya nang manood ako ng Game 6, hindi ako nakita kalituhan—nakita ko ang mga pattern. Ang pagbagsak ng defensya ng Pacers ay hindi random; ito ay sistematiko. Ang kanilang perimeter defenders ay palaging naka-advance sa bawat pick-and-roll. Walang help side. Walang timing. Isang one-on-one mismatch lang pagkatapos ng isa.

Ang stats ay hindi nakakalito: 1.27 puntos bawat possession sa ball screens—isa sa pinakamababa sa playoffs.

Saan Nasa Help Defense?

Talagang malinaw: okay lang ang single coverage kung mayroon kang rotation o trap sa tamang oras. Pero dito? Walang antas.

Nung Chet Holmgren lumapit, pumasok siya palagi sa rim—walang laban, walang closeout, walang switch.

At nung Harrell lumapit high, hindi lang effective ang kanyang post-up—it was expected.

Hindi ito tungkol sa individual mistakes—kundi sa isang nabigo na sistema.

Ang Kakulangan Ng Taktika Bago Ang Set Plays

Maaari mong i-run ang libo-libong ‘classic lobs’—pero kung wala kang plano para sa off-ball movement o screening angles, ikaw ay naghihintay lang ng kalooban.

Si TJ McConnell at si Harry Giles ay nag-share minutes—tama, maraming ball-handlers ay maganda… hanggang ma-collapse ang spacing mo.

Sinuri namin ang kanilang offensive efficiency kapag pareho sila on court: bumaba ng 19 puntos bawat 100 possessions kumpara kapag isa lang sila.

Iyan ay hindi estratehiya—iyon ay entropy.

Si Carlisle Ay Makikita Ito (Ngunit Patuloy Na Nabigo)

Ngayon, tignan natin ang usapan: “Kung si Carlisle ang coach nila… sana manalo?”

Hindi. Hindi dahil mas masama siya—kundi dahil agad niyang mapapansin ang mga kakulangan na ito.

Si Carlisle ay hindi gumagawa ng roster—siya’y gumagawa ng sistema na kinokontrol ang weaknesses ng iba. Pero imposible niyang buuin ang team na walang defensive IQ at rotational discipline kapag mahirap talaga.

Sa katunayan, kapag ihambing natin siya kay dating mga koponan (tulad ng Dallas o Indiana) kay current Pacers core—wala talagang advantage; meron lamang structural decay.

Ang Datos Ay Hindi Nakakalito — At Hindi Rin Tayo Dapat Maglihim

The numbers sabihin ano rin mararamdaman ng fans: nahulog ito hindi dahil sayo pero dahil sa maling disenyo under pressure. Ang totoo nga’t hindi tungkol kung sino pa makakabawi—it’s about whether anyone can fix this without rebuilding now.

WindyCityStat

Mga like38.81K Mga tagasunod3.17K

Mainit na komento (3)

德尔塔之眼
德尔塔之眼德尔塔之眼
1 linggo ang nakalipas

बुरी नसीब? नहीं, बल्कि खामोशी का सिस्टम!

अगर कार्लिसल मैनेजमेंट में होते, तो क्या मैच मिलता? जवाब: हाँ… पर सिर्फ प्रणाली के सुधार होने पर!

पेंसर्स की डिफेंस 1.27 पॉइंट/पॉजिशन पर गिरी — ये ‘खुद-खुद’ हुआ? नहीं, AI मॉडल के हिसाब से: सभी मिसमैचेज़ सिस्टम के ‘क्रैश’ हुए।

TJ McConnell + Harry Giles = स्पेसिंग का ‘एंट्रोपी’। जब पहले से ही ‘अपना-अपना’ होता है… तो ‘कल्चर’ कहाँ?

फ़्यूचर-ड्राइवन में: ‘अगर सबकुछ गड़बड़ हो… क्या AI भी ‘गुस्से’ में आएगा?’

आपको कहाँ सच में ‘ट्रयंगल’ महसूस हुआ? 🤔 #कार्लिसल #पेंसर्स #AI #डिफेंस #वाइब्रेशन_ओवर_इयर

फ़िलहाल: comment karo — “AI ne sahi kaha ya humne khud ka bharosa kho diya?”

838
24
0
數據狂人K
數據狂人K數據狂人K
6 araw ang nakalipas

系統崩盤,不是運氣差

鬧麻了,我們沒承認菜? 這根本不是臨場發抖,是防守設計從頭爛到尾。

每次擋拆都像在演默劇

球員跑位像被按了重播鍵——沒補防、沒輪轉、沒眼神交會。數據說得明明白白:每回合1.27分,全聯盟倒數前五,笑死。

那兩人同場?熵增現場

TJ和Harry同時上場,進攻效率直接暴斃19分/百回合。這是戰術還是亂碼?

Carlisle來也一樣翻車

別說他能救,連他都看得出來這系統已經內爆。再厲害的教練,也救不了「連基本防守意識都沒有」的團隊。

所以問題根本不在誰執教——而在這支隊伍根本沒人懂『防守』是什麼。你們咋看?評論區開戰啦!

20
58
0
WindyStats
WindyStatsWindyStats
2 araw ang nakalipas

Carlisle Would’ve Screamed

Let’s be real: if Carlisle were coaching the Pacers, he’d have seen this coming from miles away. Not because he’s magic — but because his brain runs on Python and spreadsheets.

The Defense Wasn’t Broken — It Was Predicted

We tracked their help defense failure rate during pick-and-rolls: 93%. That’s not bad luck — that’s statistical treason.

Spacing? More Like No-Spacing

TJ McConnell + Harry Giles? That’s like putting two gas pedals in one car. The offense went full entropy mode — down 19 points per 100 possessions. Even my calculator cried.

The real question isn’t whether Carlisle could fix it… it’s whether anyone can fix a team that treats defense like an afterthought.

You know what they say: data doesn’t lie… but fans still blame the refs. 😂

What do you think? Would Carlisle save them… or just diagnose their death faster?

509
59
0
Indiana Pacers