French Mock Draft: Flagg #1, Yang #22

by:WindyCityStat1 buwan ang nakalipas
867
French Mock Draft: Flagg #1, Yang #22

Ang Mock Draft Na Nagpabagabag Sa Internet

Nagpaunawa ako sa sarili ko—nagtigil ako sa pagtugtog ng jazz nang makita ko ang headline: “QiBasket ay naglabas ng mock draft na may Flagg bilang #1, Beal sa #5.” Agad akong naging analytical. Isang media mula sa France? Hindi sila nakakakuha ng malalim na impormasyon mula sa U.S. scouting. Ngunit doon sila, mapagpasikat na nagtataya ng mga manlalaro nang walang bias laban sa kanilang sariling tao.

Ako’y gumawa ng mga modelo para sa ESPN gamit ang player tracking data, college stats, at physical metrics mula 2017 hanggang kasalukuyan. Kaya kapag may mock draft na may Yang Hanshen bilang #22 at Renauld bilang #29—kahit siya’y French—tanong ko: paano nila napunta rito?

Ang Objectivity Ay Mas Malakas Kaysa Bias

Iminungkahi ko: respeto ang transparency. Kapag isinulat mo ang sariling bansa bilang mid-first-round pick (No. 29), iyon ay ipinapakita ang kaunting intellectual honesty—na hindi madalas sa sports media.

Sa aking mga modelo, binibilang ang value gamit ang standardized projections: Defensive Impact Score (DIS), Offensive Efficiency (OE), at Upside Volatility Index (UVI). Ang profile ni Renauld ay maganda sa athleticism pero limitado sa playmaking—a red flag para sa top-10.

Samantala, si Yang Hanshen ay may solidong international experience at ball-handling under pressure—but lack of NBA-sized frame and vertical leap ay nagpapakita na hindi siya elite unless he improves shooting consistency.

Ang pagkalagay niya ahead ng ilang SEC guards ay hindi sorpresa statisikal—it aligns with our model’s prediction for ‘late-first/early-second’ range.

Ang Dapat Mong Alam Pero Hindi Sinasabi Ng Datos

Ngunit narito kung bakit lumilitaw ang logic vs spectacle: position matters more than tiering.

Si Flanagan (Zaccharie Risacher) ay pinakauna bawat consensus—including me—but hindi dahil highest ceiling; dahil rock-solid floor under modern guard-centric systems.

Beal bilang #5? Maaaring mataas kung batay lang sa production—but if you factor in transition creation + spacing? Nakikinabang ito.

Ngunit… walang inaasahan na American-born prospect ay mas mataas kaysa Euro-league-tested phenom tulad ni Risacher without strong evidence.

Data vs Narrative – Ang Tunay Na Labanan Sa Draft

Ang aking modelo ay batay sa patterns—not narratives—but kahit algorithms dapat mag-isip ng konteksto:

  • Risk aversion in GM decisions leads to safer picks;
  • Team fit trumps individual talent;
  • International depth continues rising fast—especially from France and China.

drumming on the images showing these rankings reminded me why we need data-driven frameworks instead of emotional reactions. The moment someone says “This doesn’t make sense,” pause—and ask: what assumptions are driving that feeling? The real story isn’t about who got drafted where—it’s about how we judge talent today. If your source doesn’t back up rankings with measurable traits… well, that’s not analysis—it’s artistry dressed as analytics.

WindyCityStat

Mga like38.81K Mga tagasunod3.17K

Mainit na komento (5)

LuisFernandoMAD
LuisFernandoMADLuisFernandoMAD
8 oras ang nakalipas

¿Que esto es predicción o pura lotería? Si Renauld va en #29 y crees que es por talento… ¡pues mira el calendario! Mi abuelo matemático diría que esto es como predecir el resultado del clásico con un dado de Andalucía. No es cuestión de suerte — es que nadie leyó las variables. ¿Y si Beal va en #5 porque tiene más salto? ¡Pues le pregunté al botellón de vino! 😅 ¿Quién quiere apostar sin modelos? P.D.: No te fies en la intuición… confía en los datos. ¿Tú crees que esto es deporte? ¡Es una simulación con café y estadísticas!

666
22
0
ShadowFox_LON
ShadowFox_LONShadowFox_LON
1 buwan ang nakalipas

French Logic or Just Flair?

When a French outlet ranks Flagg #1 and Renauld #29… I paused my jazz playlist. Not because it’s wrong—because it’s too right.

They didn’t boost their own guys. No bias. Just cold, hard stats. That’s rare—like finding an honest sports columnist in November.

Data vs. Drama

My model says Yang Hanshen fits late-first/early-second—so why does this mock feel like it read my mind? Maybe not prophecy… just better math than most American scouts.

So Who’s Winning?

If you’re yelling “This makes no sense!” — ask yourself: are you judging by hype or by metrics? Because if your brain still runs on ‘I saw him play once’… well, welcome to the club.

You’ve been warned: the future isn’t coming—it’s already drafted.

What do YOU think? Are we ready for European analytics—or just French theatrics? Drop your take below! 🔥

97
34
0
LyonChiffres
LyonChiffresLyonChiffres
1 buwan ang nakalipas

Moi, Mathieu, analyst de données à Lyon, j’ai failli lâcher mon croissant en voyant ça : un média français qui place Flagg numéro 1… sans même avoir vu un match de college ! 😂

Mais attention : Renauld à la 29e ? Même pas un coup d’œil au dossier de son cousin ? Le respect des stats est plus fort que la nationalité ! 🇫🇷

Alors oui, les rumeurs européennes circulent… mais là c’est du pur calcul – et ça me fait rire comme un poulain dans une salle de classe !

Vous pensez que ce mock est fou ou juste… trop logique ? Dites-moi tout dans les commentaires !

50
46
0
桜咲くデータ
桜咲くデータ桜咲くデータ
1 buwan ang nakalipas

フラッグが1位?フランスのアナリストが日本の寿司屋でNBAドラフトを予測してるって…これ、統計学じゃなくて占いですか?

ヤン・ハンセンはバスケより寿司を握ってるし、レノールドは「垂直跳躍」より「天ぷらの跳躍」の方が高いとか…

本当にデータか、それともお好みの味噌汁か?コメント欄で『これは分析じゃなく、芸術だ』って言われてるけど…あなたも納得します?

879
69
0
LunaPinoy
LunaPinoyLunaPinoy
3 linggo ang nakalipas

NBA draft mock? Yung data lang ‘naglalaro’ sa kanto! Si Renauld sa #29? Parang siya’y nag-iistab sa labas ng bayan pero may Excel na panalo. Yang Hanshen? Basta may ball-handling at walang vertical leap — parang tao na naglalakad nang walang sapatos! Ang statistics? Di naman pala prediction… kundi pangarap na may formula. Kaya mo ba magtiwala sa algorithm o sa heart? Comment ka na: ‘Sino ang mas totoo—si Kobe o si nanay mo?’ 📊

209
85
0
Indiana Pacers