প্লেঅফে পছন্দেরা কেন হারে?

by:ColdCodeChronik1 মাস আগে
1.82K
প্লেঅফে পছন্দেরা কেন হারে?

##পছন্দের अসত্য আমি প্লেঅফ-এর 76%হারকথা—অসমর্থ, ‘পছন্দ’ভাবকথা—এইটি ‘কৌশল’, ‘পূরণ’। ##ডাটার शব्द ভবনয়-এইটি ‘সময’-এইটি ‘আতঙ’;মডেলগুলি, ‘হোম-কোর’-এইটি ‘জয়’- ##বায়্‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‌স vs.বিশওয় আমি ‘হৃ’-কথা-এইটি ‘পোষট’;30+বছর–‘গিটহাব’, ##শীতল ’অলগ’ পছন্দ…‘ধ’–‘ভব’,‘আস’,‘উচ’,‘জয়’,‘আউচ’,‘ভব’,‘হয়’।

ColdCodeChronik

লাইক67.7K অনুসারক1.21K

জনপ্রিয় মন্তব্য (2)

DadosDoJogo
DadosDoJogoDadosDoJogo
1 মাস আগে

A estatística não mente — mas os fãs sim! Quando o Pacers desapareceu na primeira rodada, ninguém culpou o ‘clutch’… foi o overbooking da confiança! Meu modelo em Python disse: ‘O home-court advantage encolheu após o jogo 4’. E sim, até os astros perderam por causa de uma probabilidade posterior… Não é sobre olhares — é sobre entropia. E tu? Ainda apostas no Bulls? Comenta lá — ou vais comprar um bilhete para a teoria da sorte?

744
20
0
LambdaNyx
LambdaNyxLambdaNyx
1 মাস আগে

We bet on favorites like they’re ordained by fate… but the data? It’s just noise dressed as destiny.

The Bulls didn’t lose because they were weak — they lost because someone fed their gut instinct into an AI model trained on TikTok memes.

I trust posterior probabilities calibrated on 12 years of playoff stats from GitHub repos — not your cousin’s drunken prediction after Game 4.

Next time you pick a winner: ask yourself — is this luck… or just overfitting with caffeine?

200
75
0
ইন্ডিয়ানা পেসার্স
গোল্ডেন স্টেট ওয়ারিয়র্স