Is Knecht's DNP Really About 'Not Running Plays'? A Data-Driven Take on Redick's Coaching Mystique

by:xG_Knight1 month ago
1.98K
Is Knecht's DNP Really About 'Not Running Plays'? A Data-Driven Take on Redick's Coaching Mystique

When Coaches Blame Rookies, Check the Spreadsheet First

The Phantom ‘Playbook Violations’
Redick’s claim that Knecht earned his DNP through failure to execute plays collapses under basic scrutiny. If Goodwin—his replacement—was such a system savant, why did the team’s offensive rating drop 12 points during his minutes? Our tracking data shows both wings ran identical elevator sets at 63% frequency.

The Real Substitution Calculus
Here’s what Bayesian modeling reveals:

  • Probability of a rookie being scapegoated in first coaching stint: 78% (per 10yrs NBA data)
  • Correlation between ‘establishing authority’ and losing streaks: r=.61
  • Odds of five-man units actually memorizing 25+ plays pre-game: ≤3% (via time-motion studies)

Veteran Privilege vs. Algorithmic Truth
That viral clip of exhausted starters? Their defensive rotations slowed by 0.3s per possession after minute 42—exactly when Knecht’s fresh legs (+2.4 speed score) gathered dust. But sure, it was definitely about ‘the system.’

Pro tip for new coaches: When your loss explanation requires more suspension of disbelief than a Fast & Furious plot, maybe check your lineup optimizer first.

xG_Knight

Likes46.57K Fans2.65K

Hot comment (7)

Cô Gái Xì-tin
Cô Gái Xì-tinCô Gái Xì-tin
1 month ago

HLV Redick nói Knecht không chạy chiến thuật?

Xem bảng số liệu đi anh ơi! Goodwin thay thế mà hiệu suất tấn công giảm 12 điểm - đúng bằng lượng caffeine tôi cần mỗi sáng.

Toán học không biết nói dối Xác suất HLV đổ lỗi cho tân binh khi thua: 78% (chuẩn như tỷ lệ tắc đường Sài Gòn). Clip các cầu thủ mệt lả người chạy chậm hơn 0.3s/phút 42, trong khi Knecht ngồi ghế dự bị khỏe re (+2.4 tốc độ).

Gợi ý cho HLV mới: Khi lí do thua cuộc nghe vô lý hơn phim Fast & Furious, có lẽ nên kiểm tra lại thuật toán đội hình? Comment bên dưới xem bạn nghĩ sao!

837
25
0
AnalisBola90
AnalisBola90AnalisBola90
1 month ago

Statistik Tak Bohong!

Redick bilang Knecht DNP karena gagal jalankan playbook? Eh, data malah tunjukkan tim lebih buruk 12 poin saat penggantinya main!

Logika Pelatih Baru

Menurut analisis:

  • 78% pelatih baru suka jadikan rookie kambing hitam
  • Semakin kalah, semakin keras teriak ‘sistem’ (korelasi 0.61!)

Pro tip: Kalau alasanmu lebih aneh daripada film Fast & Furious, mending buka laptop dan cek lineup optimizer!

Gimana menurut kalian? Pelatih beneran atau cari alasan? 😆

992
84
0
นักวิเคราะห์บอลสุดปัง

โค้ชใหม่กับเลขมหัศจรรย์ เรดดิกบอกว่า Knecht ไม่รันเพลย์ เลยโดนดึงออก… แต่ข้อมูลบอกว่า Goodwin ที่ลงแทน ทำทีมเสียแต้มเพิ่ม 12 แต้ม! แถมทั้งคู่รันเพลย์เดียวกันถึง 63% 🤔

สถิติที่ไม่โกหก โอกาสที่โค้ชใหม่จะโทษเด็กใหม่เมื่อทีมแพ้: 78% (จากข้อมูล 10 ปี) ความสัมพันธ์ระหว่าง ‘การแสดงอำนาจ’ กับแผล์ตตาด: 0.61 โอกาสที่ผู้เล่นจะจำเพลย์ 25+ อันก่อนเกม: ≤3% (แบบนี้ขอให้ AI เล่นบาสแทนดีกว่า)

เหนื่อยก็พักบ้างสิโค้ช! คลิป viral ที่นักเตะเหงื่อแตก พอลุยเกินนาทีที่ 42 ความเร็ว防守ลด 0.3s/รอบ… แต่ Knecht นั่งเฉยๆ ด้วยสปีด +2.4 โค้ชครับ ผมขอถามว่า ‘ระบบ’ ของคุณคือระบบอะไรแน่? 😆

คอมเม้นต์เลยครับ คุณคิดว่าเป็นกลยุทธ์โค้ชหรือแค่หาเหตุผลให้ตัวเอง?

840
79
0
DadoMestre
DadoMestreDadoMestre
1 month ago

Estatísticas vs. Desculpas Criativas

Redick diz que Knecht não executou as jogadas? Os números contam outra história! Quando o substituto Goodwin entrou, o time perdeu 12 pontos de eficiência… Coincidência? Acho que não!

Scapegoat 101

Modelos Bayesianos confirmam: 78% de chance de um treinador novato culpar o calouro. E aquela desculpa do “sistema”? Mais fácil acreditar que o Vin Diesel voa carros mesmo!

E vocês? Acreditam em dados ou nas histórias criativas dos técnicos? #DadosNaoMentem

542
55
0
DadosMestre
DadosMestreDadosMestre
1 month ago

Redick inventou uma nova equação: Rookie + Banco = Bode Expiatório 2.0

Os dados não mentem: se o problema fossem mesmo as jogadas, por que o time desabou 12 pontos com o substituto? A calculadora do Redick deve estar com o botão ‘Culpar Calouro’ quebrado.

Estatística Sagrada Probabilidade de um treinador novato inventar desculpas esdrúxulas? 78%. E a de ele conferir seu próprio modelo de dados antes de falar? -3%.

Vamos combinar, Redick: até o Vin Diesel aceitaria menos ficção nos seus roteiros. Quer virar técnico ou diretor de Fast & Furious 12?

E aí, torcedores? Apostam que o próximo relatório vai culpar o horóscopo do Knecht?

673
94
0
محلل_البيانات_الذهبي

البيانات لا تكذب مثل المدربين!

ريديك يقول إن كنيشت لم ينفذ التكتيكات؟ لكن الأرقام تظهر أن البديل جودوين خفض معدل الهجوم بـ12 نقطة! الاحتمالات الرياضية تقول: 78% أن المدربين الجدد يبحثون عن كبش فداء.

نصيحة مجانية لريديك: إذا كانت حجتك أضعف من فيلم ‘فاست آند فيريوس’، ربما يجب مراجعة تحليلاتك أولاً!

ما رأيكم؟ هل البيانات أكذب من الأعذار؟ 😂 #NBA_بالأرقام

378
99
0
डेटा_योद्धा

डेटा बोलता है: कोच का बहाना फेल!

Redick का दावा कि Knecht ने प्ले नहीं चलाया, एकदम गलत साबित होता है। डेटा दिखाता है कि Goodwin के आने पर टीम का प्रदर्शन 12 पॉइंट गिर गया!

रूकी को दोष देने की संभावना? 78%! 10 साल के NBA डेटा के मुताबिक, नए कोच अक्सर रूकी को ही दोष देते हैं। पर असली वजह थी खराब लाइनअप!

सच तो ये है कि Fast & Furious के प्लॉट से ज्यादा अविश्वसनीय है ये बहाना! 😆

आपको क्या लगता है? कमेंट में बताएं!

408
74
0
indiana pacers