Dort's 2.2 Rating: The NBA's Worst Performance in History? A Data Analyst's Brutal Breakdown

Lu Dort’s Historic 2.2 Rating: When Analytics Meet Public Outrage
The Numbers Don’t Lie Let me hit you with some cold, hard stats first:
- 125,000 user ratings (a statistically significant sample)
- Average score: 2.2⁄10 (the lowest in NBA rating history for any game with >100K votes)
- Shooting line: 1-for-5 FG (20%), 0% from three
- Most damning stat: -28 plus/minus when on court during that infamous third quarter
The Infamous Foul That Broke The Internet
That gif of Dort undercutting Ja Morant mid-air? Pure physics nightmare. My injury prediction model spiked to 87% probability of ankle trauma upon impact—and frankly, I’m surprised it wasn’t worse. Defensive aggression has its place, but this was statistical malpractice.
Why Fans Went Nuclear
The psychological tipping point? Three factors:
- Playoff stakes (3-0 series lead at stake)
- Star victim effect (Ja’s highlight-reel magnetism)
- Contrast with OKC’s epic comeback
The Thunder won despite Dort, not because of him—and basketball crowds are savvier than ever about context.
Historical Context
The only comparable? Russell Westbrook’s 1-for-13 night in 2021 scored a comparatively generous 3.7. What saved Russ? Nostalgia capital and assist numbers. Dort had no such buffer.
Data deep dive continues…
WindyStats
Hot comment (10)

Dortmund vs. Data
Dort dapat rating 2.2? Ini bukan salah satu game terburuk—ini bencana statistik!
Foul yang Membuat Dunia Gemetar
Gif undercut Ja Morant itu bikin saya langsung ngecek model cedera—87% risiko ankle trauma! Kalau bukan karena Tuhan pelindung NBA, mungkin dia udah patah kaki.
Kenapa Fans Marah?
3-0 series lead + bintang terkenal + comeback epic OKC = reaksi dunia maya meledak!
Bandingkan dengan Westbrook
Russ tahun 2021 dapat 3.7 karena nostalgia dan assist—tapi Dort nggak punya jalan keluar.
Data nggak bohong… tapi hati fans juga nggak bisa dibohongin.
Kalian percaya algoritma atau perasaan? Comment di bawah!

¡Dort 2.2? ¡Eso no es un partido, es una declaración de guerra contra la lógica! 🤯
Con un -28 de plus/minus en el tercer cuarto y solo 1 canasta en cinco intentos… ¿cómo sobrevivió el equipo sin que se le cayera el techo?
El famoso taco a Ja Morant fue tan malo que mi modelo de lesiones gritó: “¡87% de probabilidad de tobillo roto!” 😱
¿Por qué todos se volvieron locos? Porque era playoffs, porque era Ja (el rey del highlight), y porque Oklahoma City ganó… ¡a pesar de él!
Lo peor: ni nostalgia ni asistencias para salvarlo. Russell Westbrook tuvo mejor nota en su noche negra.
¿Vos lo viste? ¿O ya tenías el replay guardado para burlarte? 💀
¡Comenten si creen que esto fue el colmo o solo el comienzo del caos! 🏀🔥

Lu Dort 2.2: Đỉnh điểm của sự thất vọng
Dù là chuyên gia phân tích dữ liệu, tôi cũng phải nhăn mặt khi thấy con số 2.2 – thấp nhất mọi thời đại trên NBA!
Phản ứng mạng xã hội: Nổ tung!
Gif bị phạt thô bạo giữa không trung của Dort khiến cả internet phát điên! Mô hình dự đoán chấn thương của tôi bật lên cảnh báo 87% – may mà không có gì nghiêm trọng!
So sánh với quá khứ
Russell Westbrook từng dính phốt 1⁄13 nhưng vẫn được giữ lại vì ‘tình cảm cổ động viên’. Còn Dort? Không có trợ lý nào cứu nổi!
Các bạn thấy sao? Có nên gọi đây là “cú sập lịch sử” hay chỉ là một ngày tệ hại? Comment ngay để tranh luận nhé! 🤯

ডর্টের ২.২:
এই স্কোরটা শুনলেই মনে হয়, “আসলেই এতটা?“।
প্রথমত: 1-5 শট! (অথচ “হিট”-এরও পিছনে!)। দ্বিতীয়ত: -28 +/− —কি? বিশ্বাস করছি?
জাভা-মোরান্টকে “ভাইবা”-এর মতো উৎসব-এর গড়ান! 🚨
আমি DIY injury model-এ 87% risk predict korechhi… কিন্তু অদ্ভুত, সবকিছুটা পড়ল!
আমি Daka street baller er motoই: “ওহ, आईटी”… কিন্তু data analysis er kotha bolte hoiteche!
খেলা #3000: আপনি কি thought Lu Dort was just ‘bad’? Or was he the universe’s way of saying: “No more stats for you!”
👉 Comment section e bolo: “Dort vs Data – Kono match keno jeta hobe?”

Dort 2.2 : Le record absolu
Personne ne l’a vu venir… mais les stats ont tout dit.
Un seul mot : désastre. Un joueur à 20 % au tir ? -28 en plus-moins ? Et ça passe pour un « effort » ?
L’infraction qui a fait péter internet
Le gif du coup bas sur Ja Morant ? Un crime contre la physique. Mon modèle de prévision des blessures a hurlé à 87 %. Je dis pas que c’était intentionnel… mais le destin s’est moqué de nous.
Pourquoi les fans ont pété un câble
3-0 en playoffs + star victime + comeback OKC = explosion collective. Les gens savent lire les données maintenant.
Comparaison historique
Westbrook en 3.7 ? Il avait de la nostalgie et des passes. Dort ? Rien à sauver.
Alors oui, c’était une performance… historique. Mais pas dans le bon sens.
Vous êtes avec lui ou contre lui ? Commentez ! 🏀💥

データが泣いた
Dortの2.2評価、史上最低記録? 統計学的にも「これはマジで異常」としか言いようがない。12万5千票、20%シュート率、3点0%… しかも-28のプラスマイナス? これじゃ『試合に参加した』というより『試合を壊した』だろ。
インターネットが爆発した理由
あの一撃、ギフで見るだけで足首が痛い。私のモデルが87%の怪我確率出したってのに、まだ助かったのは奇跡だよ。 関西人の目線から言うと、「あんなプレー、監督に会っても怒られるレベル」。
過去と比べてみたら
ウェストブルックさんだって3.7だったのに。 nostalgias(ノスタルジー)があれば許される時代なのに… Dortにはその余裕なし。
どう思う? この評価、納得できる? コメント欄で議論始めよう!🔥

Dort 2.2: O Fim do Mundo?
O que é isso? Um jogador ou um erro de cálculo? Com uma média de 2.2⁄10 e -28 no plus/minus? Isso não é desempenho — é um evento histórico.
Gif que virou lenda
Aquele chute de baixo na cintura do Ja Morant? Pelo modelo de lesão que eu uso no trabalho… só faltou o som de ‘crack’ em câmera lenta.
Por que todos gritaram?
Playoffs com vantagem de 3-0 + estrela ferida + comeback épico do OKC = explosão coletiva. E o Dort? Foi como se tivesse jogado no modo ‘invisível’.
E sim, até o Russell Westbrook teve mais graça em seu pior jogo.
Vocês acham que ele vai voltar ao MVP da próxima temporada? Ou já está no Hall da Fama dos momentos vergonhosos?
Comentem lá! 🤔🔥

¡Dort 2.2!
El rating más bajo en la historia del NBA… y no es broma.
1 para 5 desde el campo, -28 de plus/minus… y ese tiro de falta que parecía un guion de física cuántica.
¿Por qué todos enloquecieron?
No fue solo el fallo: fue el contexto. Playoff, estrella lesionada (Ja Morant), y un equipo que ganó pese al desastre.
Historia comparada:
Russell Westbrook tuvo un 3.7… pero tenía nostalgia y asistencias. Dort no tenía nada… ni siquiera un paraguas contra el ridículo.
¿Lo viste? ¡Si lo viste, ya estás en el club del “no sé cómo pasó”!
¿Y tú? ¿Cuál fue tu peor momento como fan? Comenta y pon tu rating al drama 😂

Dortの2.2、神にさえも怒られるレベル
12万5千人の評価で歴代最悪の2.2点?笑いが止まらない。投篮は1本決めただけ、3ポイントはゼロ。しかも3クォーターで-28のプラスマイナス……これはもう「データ的に死んでる」状態だわ。
ジャ・モランタへの不正ファウルも、AIモデルが「足首損傷確率87%」って出してるんだから、これ以上ないほどマジで危険だった。物理法則が泣いてるよ。
ファンが怒った理由も納得。プレーオフ、スター選手、逆転劇の対比……全部揃って「あいつをどうして起用した?」ってなったわけだ。
ちなみにルッキー・ウェストブルックの3.7より悪い——『ノスタルジー』も助けてくれなかった。完全にアウト。
どう思う?コメント欄で大討論だ!🔥

Dort’s 2.2? More like Dort’s Disaster.
We’re talking stats so bad they made my regression model cry.
- 1-for-5? Cute.
- -28 P/M? That’s not defense—that’s statistical war crime.
The foul? A physics experiment gone wrong. My injury predictor said 87% chance of ankle trauma… and I’m still shocked he didn’t break gravity.
Fans went nuclear not just for Ja—but because the Thunder won despite him. Classic Moneyball irony: the data says “no,” but the crowd says “why even try?”
Russ had nostalgia; Dort had zero buffers.
So yeah—NBA’s worst performance? Maybe not statistically, but definitely emotionally.
You feel me?
Drop your worst playoff meltdown below—let’s rank them together! 🏀💥
- NBA Summer League Gem: Pacers' 44th Pick Bennedict Mathurin Goes 6-for-6, Shows Defensive ProwessAs a data-driven NBA analyst, I break down the impressive Summer League debut of Indiana Pacers' rookie Bennedict Mathurin. The 44th pick shocked with perfect 6/6 shooting (including 1/1 from three) for 13 points, plus 4 rebounds and a disruptive 4 steals in just 15 minutes. This performance suggests potential rotation readiness - let's examine what the numbers reveal about his two-way potential.
- Thunder's Win Over Pacers: A Data-Driven Reality Check on Their Championship PotentialAs a sports data analyst, I break down the Thunder's recent win against the Pacers, highlighting key stats like turnovers and scoring efficiency. While the victory might seem impressive, the numbers reveal flaws that cast doubt on their status as a true championship contender. Join me as I dissect why this performance falls short compared to past NBA title teams.
- Thunder's Switch-All Defense Stifles Pacers: Why Simplicity Wins in the NBA PlayoffsAs a data-driven analyst, I break down how Oklahoma City's ruthless switching defense neutralized Indiana's ball movement in Games 4-5. When Shai and J-Dub outscored Haliburton's trio 48-22 in isolation plays, the math became undeniable. Sometimes basketball isn't about complexity - it's about having two killers who can win 1-on-1 matchups when it matters most. Our advanced metrics show why this strategy could seal the championship in Game 6.
- Tyrese Haliburton: Play Smart, Not Just Hard – Why the Pacers' Future Hinges on Controlled AggressionAs a data-driven NBA analyst, I break down why Tyrese Haliburton's composure in high-stakes games is more valuable than raw aggression. With Indiana's salary structure rivaling OKC's, strategic patience could make them an Eastern Conference powerhouse—if their young star avoids career-derailing risks. Numbers don't lie: calculated growth beats reckless heroics.
- Data-Driven Analysis: Should the Golden State Warriors Adopt the Indiana Pacers' Offensive Blueprint?As the NBA Finals unfold, basketball analysts are drawing parallels between the Golden State Warriors and the Indiana Pacers. Both teams showcase dynamic, fast-paced offenses with an emphasis on ball movement and player mobility. But can the Warriors benefit from adopting the Pacers' model? As a London-based sports data analyst specializing in NBA metrics, I delve into the numbers to compare these two offensive systems, examining pace, shot selection, and ball movement to determine if a tactical shift could revive the Warriors' championship aspirations.
- Was Klay Thompson Really a Superstar in 2018-19? A Data-Driven Look at His Peak1 week ago
- Why the Warriors Should Move On from Jonathan Kuminga: A Data-Driven Perspective1 month ago
- Draymond Green: The Unsung Rhythm Master of the Warriors' Symphony1 month ago
- Warriors' Forward Dilemma: A Data-Driven Breakdown of 10 Potential Fits Without Trading Curry, Butler, or Green1 month ago
- 5 Players the Golden State Warriors Should Consider Moving On From This Offseason1 month ago
- Was Steph Curry's Early Contract Extension a Strategic Misstep? A Data-Driven Analysis1 month ago
- The Data Doesn't Lie: How Minnesota Let Jonathan Kuminga Feast in the Playoffs1 month ago
- 3 Trade Scenarios That Could Convince the Spurs to Part With Their No. 2 Pick (For Harper)1 month ago
- The Draymond Green Debate: How Much More Do Critics Want?3 weeks ago
- Why Brandin Podziemski is Poised for a Breakout Season: A Data-Driven Analysis3 weeks ago